论文部分内容阅读
五、社会保障各个项目行政的相对集中 在社会保障的行政方面,也存在着一个集中还是分散的问题。从表4可以看出,与经办权的分散不同,社会保障的行政明显具有相对集中的特点。在建有四个项目的43个国家和地区中,实行统一行政的有9个,占21％,而经办权实行大统一的只占6％。实行三个项目相对统一的有23例(8+9+10+11),占51％,而经办只占23％。四个项目行政的大统一和相对统一占了72％,只有28％的国家和地区在行政上采取相对比较分散的办法,由同一机构管理两项目,但没有一个国家或地区采取完全分散的办法。经办权则正好相反,统一和相对统一的只占29％,其余71％是分散的。
Fifth, the relative concentration of social security in various projects in the administrative aspects of social security, there is also a centralized or decentralized issues. As can be seen from Table 4, different from the decentralization of the right to operate, the social security administration clearly has the characteristics of relative concentration. Of the 43 countries and regions that have set up four projects, 9 are unified administrations, accounting for 21%, while only 6% are major unions. There were 23 cases (8 + 9 + 10 + 11), accounting for 51% of the three projects, and only 23% of the projects handled. The large-scale unification and relative unification of the four projects accounted for 72% of the total. Only 28% of countries and regions took a comparatively decentralized administrative approach. Both projects were managed by the same institution. However, no single country or region adopted a completely decentralized approach . The right to handle is the opposite, with only 29% being unified and relatively uniformed, with the remaining 71% scattered.