论文部分内容阅读
“经济人”假设的片面性在于:在一定程度上强化了货币形式的财富概念,弱化了实体形式的财富概念,助长人们追求和放纵金融投机的社会心理和社会惯性;虚拟市场价格被投机家肆意操控的现实证明,建立在“经济人”假设基础之上的,适合实体经济运行的价值规律已经不能涵盖虚拟经济的运行过程,“无形之手”的作用需要重新审视;“经济人”假设忽视了经济主体私利性之间的相互制约和相互依赖关系,从而缺乏社会财富配置的公平性的深度分析;市场主体的自治性品质是市场经济健康运行的内在需要,不是可有可无的。利己与自治应该是市场主体人格的两个相辅相成的方面;私有产权制度不能保障个人追求物质利益导致社会利益的自动实现。
The one-sidedness of the hypothesis of “economic man” lies in the fact that it reinforces the concept of wealth in monetary form to a certain extent, weakens the concept of wealth in the form of entity, encourages people to pursue and indulge the social psychology and social inertia of financial speculation; the virtual market price is speculative The real control of the house shows that the law of value suitable for the operation of the real economy based on the hypothesis of “economic man” can no longer cover the operation of the fictitious economy. The role of the “invisible hand” needs to be revisited. “Economic man ” hypothesis neglects the mutual restraint and interdependence between the economic entities ’selfishness, and lacks the depth analysis of the fairness of the social wealth allocation; the autonomy quality of market entities is the inherent need of the healthy operation of the market economy, Not optional. Self-interest and self-government should be two complementary aspects of market personality; private property rights system can not guarantee the pursuit of material interests of individuals lead to the realization of social benefits.