论文部分内容阅读
目的观察醒脑静注射液联合纳洛酮注射液治疗急性酒精中毒的临床疗效。方法选取大同市中医院2010年3月—2015年3月收治的232例急性酒精中毒患者,按照随机数字表法分为3组,A组给予醒脑静注射液治疗,B组给予纳洛酮注射液治疗,C组给予醒脑静注射液+纳洛酮注射液治疗。观察对比3组患者的意识恢复时间、症状消失时间、住院时间以及临床疗效、不良反应发生情况。结果 C组患者意识恢复时间、症状消失时间及住院时间均短于A组和B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组和B组意识恢复时间、症状消失时间及住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组患者治疗总有效率高于A组和B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);A组和B组治疗总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.01)。3组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论醒脑静注射液联合纳洛酮注射液治疗急性酒精中毒可快速缓解患者症状,提高临床疗效。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of xingnaojing injection combined with naloxone injection in the treatment of acute alcoholism. Methods A total of 232 acute alcoholism patients who were admitted to Datong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2010 to March 2015 were randomly divided into three groups according to random number table. Group A received Xingnaojing injection, while group B received naloxone Injection treatment, C group given Xingnaojing injection + naloxone injection treatment. Observe the contrast group 3 patients’ consciousness recovery time, symptom disappear time, hospitalization time as well as the clinical curative effect, the adverse reaction situation. Results The recovery time, disappearance of symptoms and hospital stay in group C were shorter than those in group A and group B (P <0.05). The recovery time, the disappearance of symptoms and the length of hospital stay in group A and group B , The difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in group C was higher than that in group A and group B (P <0.01). There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between group A and group B (P> 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the three groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Xingnaojing injection combined with naloxone injection in the treatment of acute alcoholism can quickly relieve symptoms and improve clinical efficacy.