论文部分内容阅读
国有企业监管是一个世界性的难题,各国从本国实际出发,形成了一些监管模式,对这些模式进行系统的分类,对其不同特色和优势进行比较分析,可以对调整我国的国有企业监管模式产生有益的启发。一、国有企业监管模式的国际比较 1、美国以国会为主的监管模式美国国会是国有企业产权的最终所有者。它通过立法,决定着从企业设立、市场准入、经营目标、经营范围、企业内部管理体制到董事会组成等一系列重大事件。此外,国会有权派遣监督员和监督团,随时审核国企的经营状况,对企业实行财务监控,并在必要时作出撤消、出售、兼并国企的决定。政府根据国会的决议专设委员会,运用行政的和经济的手段对
The regulation of state-owned enterprises is a worldwide problem. Countries start their own countries and form some regulatory models. They systematically classify these models and comparatively analyze their different characteristics and advantages, so as to adjust the regulatory model of state-owned enterprises in China Helpful Inspiration First, the international comparison of regulatory mode of state-owned enterprises 1, the United States-based regulatory model Congress is the ultimate owner of state-owned property rights. Through legislation, it decides a series of major events from the establishment of enterprises, market access, business objectives, business scope, internal management system to the composition of the board of directors. In addition, Congress has the power to send supervisors and supervisory missions to review the state of affairs of state-owned enterprises at any time, implement financial controls over the enterprises and, if necessary, make decisions on the cancellation, sale and merger of state-owned enterprises. The government set up an ad hoc committee based on the resolutions of the National Assembly, using administrative and economic means