论文部分内容阅读
评点和诗话作为中国传统文学批评中特殊的批评形式,在创体时间、形式体制和批评方法上具有较大的相似性,这是二者可相互借鉴的客观基础。清代杜诗未刊评点家往往身兼批点者和诗话作者的双重身份,这是二者多互为采撷的主体因素。清代杜诗未刊评点与相关诗话著作的密切关系具体表现在:杜诗未刊评点是某些诗话著作或笔记类著作的直接来源;诗话的繁盛为杜诗未刊评点综合评本的形成提供了资料来源。当然,清代杜诗未刊评点所引诗话与相关诗话著作亦存在或增删、或补充、或辨正的相异之处,这些转录过程中的差异或变动侧面凸显出不同诗学研究者诗学理念、取舍标准、关注重心等层面的差异。探讨杜诗未刊评点与相关诗话著作的关系,可管窥清代杜诗评点及杜甫诗话发展演变的冰山一角。
As a special form of criticism in Chinese traditional literary criticism, commentaries and poesies have greater similarities in the creation time, the formal system and the criticism methods, which are the objective bases for the two to learn from each other. In the Qing dynasty, Du Fu poetry is often not the author of critics who are both punctual and poetic writer’s dual identity, which is the main factor of the two each other more pick. The close relationship between the unpublished editorials of Du Fu in the Qing dynasty and related poems is specifically illustrated in the following points: The unpublished edict of Du Fu is the direct source of the writings of certain poetry or writings; the prosperous poetry provides the material for the compilation of comprehensive commentary source. Of course, the differences or changes in the transcribing process between the poetics and related poetry quotations of Du Fu poetry in the Qing dynasty also exist or add or delete, or supplement, , Choose the standard, pay attention to the differences of the center of gravity. To explore the relationship between Du Fu ’s unpublished comments and related poems, and to explore the tip of the iceberg in Du Qing Poetry commentary and the development and evolution of Du Fu’ s poems.