论文部分内容阅读
在当代分析法理学的范围内,哈特的法律概念分析模式具有举足轻重的地位,他试图运用语言分析的陈述策略,动摇了传统分析法学根深蒂固的霸权地位,反击了现实主义法学对规则确定性的挑战。哈特的建构策略将法律概念分析的模式建构从传统过渡到现代,具有呈上启下的历史作用。哈特通过对奥斯丁策略性地批判,为其模式的建构提供了正当性依据。继而建构了发现规则行为的“内在方面”、强调主次两类规则的结合、划分规则的明确与模糊“三步走”的建构策略。
In the context of contemporary analytical jurisprudence, Hart’s legal concept analysis model plays a decisive role. He attempts to use the linguistic analysis of the presentation strategy, shaken the deep-rooted hegemony of traditional analytical jurisprudence and countered the certainty of the rules of law challenge. Hart’s strategy of constructing the historical concept of legal concept analysis from the traditional transition to the modern history. By critically criticizing Austin, Hart provided justification for the construction of his model. Then it constructs the “inner aspect ” of discovering the behavior of the rules, emphasizing the combination of the primary and the secondary rules, the definite and fuzzy rules of the construction, and the strategy of constructing the “three steps”.