论文部分内容阅读
面对着近现代西方文化和社会所表现出的致命危机,东欧新马克思主义者科拉科夫斯基将希望寄托于传统文化精神的复兴,即信仰权威的重塑上。因此无论是宏观的理论主旨还是相对微观的具体内容层面,其以传统信仰的复兴为核心的现代性脱困方案都与新正统神学创始人卡尔·巴特的理论存在着重大交叉,其中最为明显的就是二者都试图经由上帝神圣性的恢复来解决信仰和西方文化的复合性危机,并在这一过程中坚决反对基督教世俗化的倾向。当然由于学理背景和理论立场的因素,二者的思想也存在着本质性的差别。与巴特将上帝置于思想核心的做法不同,科拉科夫斯基理论中贯串始终的第一要素乃是人本身及其存在方式。
In the face of the deadly crisis shown by modern Western culture and society, Kolakovsky, a Neo-Marxist in East Europe, hopes to re-establish the spiritual rejuvenation of traditional culture, that is, to reshape the belief and authority. Therefore, both the macroscopic theory and the concrete microcosmic content level, the modernization dilemma with the revival of the traditional belief has a great intersection with the theory of Karl Butter, the founder of Neo-Orthodox theology. The most obvious is that Both seek to resolve the complex crisis of faith and Western culture through the restoration of God’s sanctity and, in the process, firmly oppose the secularization of Christianity. Of course, due to the academic background and the theoretical position of the factors, there is an essential difference between the two ideas. Unlike Bart’s approach of placing God at the heart of the mind, the first and foremost element in Korakowski’s theory is the human being and the way in which it exists.