论文部分内容阅读
目的分析研讨血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验在区分小儿感染类型中的临床效果。方法本次讨论中所研讨的150例患儿均随机从我院2014年9月至2016年8月期间收治的感染性疾病患儿中筛选而出,依据临床诊断结果,将细菌感染者纳入研究组中,将病菌感染者纳入对照组,各组75例患儿,对患儿进行血常规和C-反应蛋白检验,再分别对研究组患儿进行血常规和C-反应蛋白检验、及血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验,将两组患儿WBC(白细胞计数)、CRP浓度纳入对比研讨中。结果研究组患儿CRP浓度为(39.37±10.12)mg/L、WBC为(16.41±3.87)109/L均比对照组(4.92±2.84)mg/L、(5.59±1.82)109/L要高,组间数据有统计学意义(P<0.05);血常规联合C-反应蛋白的阳性检出率93.33%显著高于C-反应蛋白阳性检出率66.67%、血常规阳性检出率62.67%,组间数据有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血常规联合C-反应蛋白检验在区分小儿感染类型中,对小儿病菌感染、细菌感染能做出明确判断,临床应用及推广价值大。
Objective To study the clinical effect of routine blood test and C-reactive protein test in distinguishing infantile infection types. Methods All the 150 children studied in this study were randomly selected from children with infectious diseases admitted from September 2014 to August 2016 in our hospital. According to the results of clinical diagnosis, bacterial infections were included in the study In the group, 75 patients with pathogenic bacteria were enrolled in the control group, and 75 children in each group were tested for blood routine and C-reactive protein. The blood and C-reactive protein in the study group and the blood Routine joint C-reactive protein test, the two groups of children WBC (white blood cell count), CRP concentrations included in the comparative study. Results The CRP concentration in study group was (39.37 ± 10.12) mg / L and WBC was (16.41 ± 3.87) 109 / L respectively, which was significantly higher than that in control group (4.92 ± 2.84) mg / L and (5.59 ± 1.82) (P <0.05). The positive detection rate of blood combined with C-reactive protein was 93.33%, which was significantly higher than that of C-reactive protein (66.67%). The positive detection rate of blood was 62.67% , The data between groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The combination of blood routine test and C-reactive protein test can distinguish children from other types of infections and can make a clear judgment of bacterial infection and bacterial infection in children. The clinical application and promotion value are great.