论文部分内容阅读
本文以一例征收农民集体土地引发行政复议纠纷的案件作为切入点,紧紧围绕征收农民集体土地中行政复议申请人资格的争议问题展开讨论。一方面从当前我国行政复议制度的行政复议申请人的资格问题探究其争议焦点和行政复议法的立法价值取向。另一方面从我国当前农民集体土地产权制度探究其历史发展轨迹、现实困境和立法价值取向。指出本案中行政复议申请人资格的争议问题是由两种不相称的立法价值取向之间在实践中产生的矛盾和冲突造成的。在此基础上提出案件的解决不应是一个法律技术的问题,而应是一个价值上的考量问题。这个价值上的取向不同将直接决定案件申请人的资格问题。
This article takes a case of collecting peasant collective land for initiating administrative reconsideration dispute as an entry point, and discusses the dispute over the qualification of applicants for administrative reconsideration in collecting peasant collective land. On the one hand, it explores the focus of controversy and the legislative value orientation of the administrative reconsideration law from the issue of the administrative reconsideration of applicants in our country’s administrative reconsideration system. On the other hand, from the perspective of the peasant collective land ownership system in our country, we explore the historical development track, the realistic predicament and the legislative value orientation. It points out that the controversial issue of the qualifications of applicants for administrative reconsideration in this case is caused by the contradictions and conflicts in practice between the two incompatible legislative values. On the basis of this, it is suggested that the solution of the case should not be a question of law and technology, but should be a question of value consideration. This value orientation will directly determine the qualification of the applicant for the case.