论文部分内容阅读
通过史料钩沉和分析可知,北宋后期、南宋、辽金、明朝末年均有宫廷傩仪的施行,只有元朝一代,可以算作宫廷傩仪的衰亡时期。据此不但可以勾勒出唐五代以后宫廷傩仪的发展历程,也可以进一步说明:清人关于宫廷傩仪不见于正史的说法是不准确的;而近代学界将契丹“惊鬼”之俗和蒙古“脱灾”之俗视为傩仪也不准确;至于把元朝的国俗“游皇城”等同于傩仪一说,则更加不能成立,因为那是和密宗仪式联系在一起的。
Through the analysis of historical data and analysis, we can see that in the late Northern Song Dynasty, the Southern Song Dynasty, Liao Jin and Ming dynasties all performed the imperial court instrument. Only the Yuan Dynasty generation can be regarded as the decline period of the imperial court instrument. Accordingly, not only can we outline the development history of the court imperial ceremonies since the Tang and the Five Dynasties, but also further explain that it is inaccurate for the Qing people to say that the imperial court was not found in the official history; And Mongolia “disregard ” of the custom as a meter instrument is not accurate; As for the Yuan Dynasty’s national customs “tour Imperial City” is equivalent to a meter instrument, it is even more can not be established, because that is associated with the Tantric ceremony of.