论文部分内容阅读
一部书稿,一个刊物的编辑过程中,难度最大的是审稿。审稿是按照期刊的性质、方针、指导思想、任务、要求,决定文稿的优劣和取舍,是对即将投入社会传播过程的精神产品作质量上的把关。它是编辑水平的具体表现,也是对编辑素养、编辑道德的一种全面检验。本文拟就审稿的三个问题作些探讨。一、审稿是精神生产不可缺少的内在环节精神生产是一种由个体或若干个体结成的群体,通过脑力劳动进行的一种特有的劳动方式。这种劳动方式的主体是脑力劳动者。脑力劳动者往往从个人的素养和个人所理解的社会需要出发,按照个人的理想、信念、爱好、特长、价值标准去搜集、选择、整理古今中
A manuscript, a publication editing process, the most difficult is to review draft. Peer review is based on the nature of the journal, guidelines, guiding ideology, tasks, requirements, determine the merits and demerits of the manuscript, is about to put into the social transmission of spiritual products for quality checks. It is a concrete manifestation of the editorial level, and it is also a comprehensive test of editing literacy and editing ethics. This article intends to discuss the review of the three issues. First, reviewing is an indispensable inner part of spiritual production Spiritual production is a kind of peculiar working method carried out by a group of individuals or several individuals through mental work. The main body of this mode of working is mental workers. Mental workers are often based on individual literacy and social needs understood by individuals, in accordance with personal ideals, beliefs, hobbies, expertise, value standards to collect, select, organize ancient and modern