论文部分内容阅读
[目的]比较两种不同标准用于诊断人群代谢综合征(MS)的一致性情况。[方法]以健康体检人群为研究对象,采用国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)和中华医学会糖尿病分会(CDS)两种MS诊断标准,比较人群代谢综合征的流行特征并计算两法一致性的Kappa值。[结果]两诊断标准的MS标化率分别为8.98%和8.82%,两法一致性Kappa值为0.629;除TG外,其他各组分患病率均有显著差异(P﹤0.01)。[结论]两种标准诊断MS各组分的患病率有差异,一致性中等。
[Objective] To compare the consistency of two different criteria in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MS) in the population. [Methods] With the health examination population as the research object, the diagnostic criteria of two kinds of MS, including the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the Chinese Medical Association Diabetes Branch (CDS), were compared. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was compared and the Kappa value . [Results] The MS standardization rates of the two diagnostic criteria were 8.98% and 8.82% respectively, and the Kappa values of two methods were 0.629. The prevalences of other components except TG were significantly different (P <0.01). [Conclusion] The prevalence of each component of two standard diagnostic MS is different, with the same consistency.