關於春秋後期“鑄刑書(鼎)”的討論,從楊鴻烈、胡適和陳顧遠先生等開始,一直是學界討論的熱點。其中,從法制史的角度揭示其意義的論述累篋盈筐,頗多争議之中,不乏創見。但是從學術史的角度,尤其與先秦諸子學的關係上,卻鮮有議論。以筆者管見所及,孫開泰先生的《論三晉古文化對春秋戰國諸子百家争鳴的影響》則已屬“稀聲”。孫先生立足於“宗法制和禮樂制度的影響比較小,是三晉古文化的特點”之上指出,發生在三晉的“鑄刑鼎”及變法改 Discussions on the late Spring and Autumn Period casting books (Ding) from the beginning, such as Yang Honglie, Hu Shi and Chen Guyuan, has been a hot topic in academic discussion. Among them, from the perspective of the history of legal history to reveal the significance of the discussion of tired accumulated surplus basket, many controversies, there is no lack of creativity. However, from the angle of academic history, especially the relations with philosophers of pre-Qin Dynasty, there is little discussion about it. In the author’s opinion, Mr. Sun Kaitai’s “On the influence of the Three Kingdoms ancient culture on the hundred schools of thought in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period” is already a “rare sound.” Based on the fact that “the influence of the patriarchal clan system and the ritual and court system is relatively small, it is the characteristic of the ancient culture of the Three Kingdoms” that Mr. Sun pointed out that the “death penalty”