论文部分内容阅读
合同救济旨在于实现合同总剩余最大化和增进社会福利。强制履行是违约救济措施之一,与损害赔偿等救济措施具有同等地位。强制履行在促进合同投资和实现当事人利润最大化方面的效率与期待利益赔偿没有差别。二者在交易费用方面没有差别。就最优投资激励和交易费用节省而言,它们都不能成为最优违约救济措施。违约救济措施的适用应尊重当事人的选择。我国合同法对强制履行的规定体现了合同自由原则,充分尊重了当事人的选择。
Contractual relief aims to maximize total contractual surplus and promote social welfare. Compulsory performance is one of the remedies for breach of contract, with the same status as relief measures such as damages. There is no difference between the efficiency and the expectation of benefit compensation of compulsory performance in promoting contract investment and maximizing the profits of the parties. There is no difference in transaction costs between the two. Neither can they be the optimal default remedy in terms of optimal investment incentives and transaction cost savings. The application of default remedies should respect the choice of the parties. The stipulation of our country’s contract law on compulsory execution embodies the principle of freedom of contract and fully respects the choice of parties.