论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察妇科常规治疗联合盆腔炎康复操治疗盆腔炎的临床疗效,方法:选取120例湿热瘀结型盆腔炎患者为研究对象,随机分为实验组和对照组各60例,实验组采用妇科常规治疗联合盆腔炎康复操,对照组仅用妇科常规治疗,比较两组疗效,结果:实验组总有效率为92.88%,高于对照组82.64%(P<0.05)。结论:妇科常规治疗联合盆腔炎康复操治疗盆腔炎是一种有效方法,值得临床推广运用。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of routine gynecological pelvic inflammatory disease and pelvic inflammatory disease rehabilitation treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.Methods: 120 cases of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease of damp-heat stasis were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 60 cases in each group. Gynecology The conventional treatment combined pelvic inflammatory disease rehabilitation exercises, the control group only gynecological routine treatment, the two groups were compared. The results: The total effective rate was 92.88% in the experimental group, 82.64% higher than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Gynecological conventional pelvic inflammatory disease and pelvic inflammatory disease treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease is an effective method, worthy of clinical promotion and use.