论文部分内容阅读
袁宏道诗文系年问题是一个异常突出并值得现代学术背景下古代文学研究深加思考的重要问题。迄今为止诸家对袁宏道诗文系年的说法存在歧说或错误的情况去其重复者达到四百零五篇之多,这充分说明袁宏道及公安派研究的基础的可靠性令人置疑,与此相关的袁宏道年谱、评传、思想及文学观、文风演变等方方面面的研究不免存在沙上建屋的现象而须加全面梳理和夯实。本文追溯了袁宏道诗文系年问题的缘起,分析了歧说类别、错误原因及其对袁宏道和公安派研究带来的种种影响。
Yuan Hong-dao’s poetry and prose department is an important issue which is outstanding and deserves further consideration in ancient literature research under the modern academic background. So far, the number of cases of misunderstanding or misunderstanding of the year of Yuan Hong-dao’s poetry and prosecutions has reached 405 as many as there are duplicates, which fully shows the reliability of the foundation of the study by Yuan Hongdao and the Gong’an School is questionable The related research on Yuan Hongdao’s chronicle, comment on biography, thoughts and literary concepts and the evolution of style of writing inevitably exist in the phenomenon of building houses on sand, which should be comprehensively reviewed and consolidated. This paper traced the origins of Yuan Hongdao ’s poetry and prose year and analyzed the categories of affair and the reasons for the errors and the various influences they had on the study of Yuan Hongdao and the Gong’an School.