现在谈第二个问题,正确地估计档案的史料价值,既重视又不轻信。旧政权档案形成于各个历史时期,形成于各个阶级、阶层各个方面。这些档案代表着不同的阶级利益和观点。档案记载了许许多多的历史事件和社会现象,内容很丰富,并且是原始史料,所以我们在研究工作里重视档案,在一般情况下优先利用档案的原则是正确的。比如刚才所说的书。我们有上谕档应该优先用上谕档,上谕档第一,清实录第二,东华录第三,根据东华录来编写的第四,因为原始的资料比较符合当时的情况.档案所反映的内容大都比图书具体、详细,因为书籍所叙说的往往是经过概括,经过一种“再创 Now I will talk about the second issue and correctly estimate the historical value of the file, not only attaching importance to it but also not believing in it. The old regime archives were formed in various historical periods and formed in all aspects of various classes and strata. These files represent different class interests and perspectives. The archives contain a great many historical events and social phenomena. They are rich in content and are original historical materials. Therefore, we attach importance to archives in our research work. In principle, the principle of giving priority to the use of archives is correct. Such as the book just said. We have to give priority to use the encyclical file, the encyclical file first, clear record second, Tung Wah recorded third, according to Tung Hwa to write the fourth, because the original data more in line with the circumstances. Most of the content reflected in the book than the specific, detailed, because the books are often described by the generalized, after a "recreate