论文部分内容阅读
本刊今年第一期刊发了《秘密图纸是真是假——“正昌”“牧羊”讼战》的“案例新闻”,引起一些读者的关注。最近此案又有新的进展,国家科技部有关部门鉴定“牧羊”失窃图纸“为公众所知悉”,也就是说不属于商业秘密。南京市检察机关也做出结论,认定盗窃图纸为个人行为,与江苏正昌集团企业无关,不予起诉。此案虽画上了句号,但也给人们留下了许多思考。 一件本不复杂的盗窃案,却成为诋毁竞争对手的借口,被炒作得沸沸扬扬,这样的案例在近几年的市场竞争中已不鲜见。“正昌”与“牧羊”既是同乡,又是同行;既是饲料机械行业举足轻重的企业,又是地方经济的支柱企业,二者本可各自发挥优势,共图发展大业,现在却是同根相煎,纷争不断,甚至不惜以不正当竞争的手段攻击对方、诋毁对方,这种无序竞争的局面,该到被制止的时候了。
This issue of the first issue of this year’s issue of “secret drawings is true or false -” Chang “” shepherd “case” news of the case, aroused the concern of some readers. Recently, there have been new developments in this case. Relevant departments of the Ministry of Science and Technology have appraised the stolen blueprints of “shepherds” for the public’s knowledge, that is to say, they are not trade secrets. Nanjing prosecutors also concluded that the theft drawings as a personal act, and Jiangsu Zhengchang Group has nothing to do business, not to prosecute. Although the case is drawn to a full stop, it has also left many people thinking. An uncomplicated theft case has become an excuse to vilify its competitors. It has been aroused by the hype. Such cases are not uncommon in the market competition in recent years. Both “Zhengchang” and “Shepherding” are both fellow countrymen and fellow travelers. They are both pivotal enterprises in the feed machinery industry and pillar enterprises in the local economy. Both of them may have their own respective advantages and jointly develop their great cause of development. , Disputes continue, and even at the expense of unfair competition, they attack each other and slander each other. This disorderly competition has come to a halt.