论文部分内容阅读
在某种程度上,科恩对于马克思的劳动分工虽然有所论述,但是他的论述只是维护着一种传统的解释,即,对马克思在共产主义条件下劳动分工的误解——马克思倡导劳动分工的消失。与此相反,伦佐·劳伦特认为马克思所倡导的劳动分工的消失实际上是共产主义条件下工场手工业劳动分工的消失,以及脑力劳动与体力劳动对立的消失,马克思对劳动分工的批判并不是理查德·阿尼森所认为的完美主义,实际上依然是对“有意义工作的权利”的捍卫。
To some extent, though Cohn discusses the division of labor in Marx’s work, his argument is only to uphold the traditional interpretation that Marx misunderstood the division of labor under communism: Marx advocates the division of labor disappear. On the contrary, Renzo Laurent argues that the disappearance of the division of labor advocated by Marx is actually the disappearance of the division of labor in the workshop handicraft industry under communism and the disappearance of the opposition between mental and physical labor. Marx’s critique of the division of labor and Perfectionism, not what Richard Arnsen thinks, is in fact the defense of “the right to meaningful work.”