“女士优先”、优待女性的实践在法学上可定性为纠偏行动。西方国家的宪政实践对待纠偏行动持肯定或否定的态度。欧美的经验显示,只有当纠偏行动的目标是合宪的,并且手段严格适合于促进合宪目标时,才具有正当性而不构成反向歧视。这值得我国借鉴。 “Lady priority ”, the practice of preferential treatment of women in law can be defined as corrective action. The constitutional practice in western countries holds a positive or negative attitude towards corrective action. The experience of Europe and the United States shows that legitimacy does not constitute reverse discrimination only when the objective of the corrective action is constitutional and the means are strictly adapted to promote the constitutional goal. This is worth our reference.