论文部分内容阅读
美墨电信争端案是WTO的争端解决机构处理的首个关于国际反垄断争端的案件,它对处理未来国际服务贸易争端以及有关国际竞争立法有深刻的影响。通过对美墨电信争端的三个核心问题一跨境服务的认定、公私混合型反竞争行为和成本导向定价一进行法经济学分析,可以看到争端解决机构的专家组做出的裁决背后的经济合理性。同时指出法经济学分析在国际贸易争端分析方面应用时尤其要注意对跨境交易成本和贸易关系的网络外部性问题的处理。
The case of the dispute between the United States and Mexico is the first dispute over the international antitrust dispute handled by the WTO dispute settlement agency. It has a profound impact on the handling of future disputes over international trade in services and legislation on international competition. By examining the three core issues of the U.S.-Mexico telecommunications dispute, cross-border service identification, public-private mixed anticompetitive behavior and cost-oriented pricing, as far as legal and economic analysis is concerned, we can see that behind the ruling of the panel of dispute resolution agencies Economic rationality. At the same time, it points out that the application of law and economics analysis in the analysis of international trade disputes pays special attention to the handling of the issue of network externalities in cross-border transaction costs and trade relations.