论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对比分析不同治疗方案对盆腔炎的治疗效果。方法 :选取在我院门诊就诊的盆腔炎患者114例,随机分为A组和B组,A组采用常规西药治疗,B组采用中西医联合治疗,比较两组的临床疗效。结果 :两组治疗前盆腔炎包块面积差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组治疗后盆腔炎包块面积均明显减小(P<0.05),且B组盆腔炎包块面积远小于A组(P<0.05);B组临床有效率96.49%,高于A组的81.25%(P<0.05);B组不良反应发生率1.75%,稍低于A组5.26%(P>0.05)。结论 :康妇炎联合常规西药对盆腔炎的治疗效果好,临床有效率高,值得普遍应用。
Objective: To compare and analyze the therapeutic effect of different treatment regimens on pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients with pelvic inflammatory disease were randomly divided into group A and group B. Patients in group A received conventional western medicine. Group B received combined traditional Chinese and western medicine. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in pelvic mass area between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). The area of pelvic inflammatory mass in both groups was significantly reduced (P <0.05), and pelvic inflammatory disease in group B was far (P <0.05). The clinical effective rate in group B was 96.49%, which was higher than 81.25% in group A (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group B was 1.75%, slightly lower than that in group A ). Conclusion: Kang Fu Yan combined with conventional western medicine pelvic inflammatory disease treatment effect is good, clinical efficient, it is widely used.