论文部分内容阅读
相关研究表明,关于污染环境犯罪的我国《刑法》第338条在司法适用中判决较少。来自司法实务机关的调研也表明,《刑法》第338条适用中存在诸多障碍。《刑法修正案》(八)确立的“污染环境罪”虽然在形式上降低了入罪门槛,但在司法实践中存在较大争议。污染环境罪司法困境的解除既取决于清晰的司法判定标准,也取决于污染环境刑事司法过程中行政机关与司法机关的衔接,以及在生态文明整体视野下污染环境罪社会认知根基的构建和“罪感”与“恶感”社会标尺的存在。
Relevant researches show that Article 338 of China’s criminal law on crime of environmental pollution is less judged in judicial application. Research from judicial entities also shows that there are many obstacles to the application of Article 338 of the Penal Code. Although the crime of environmental pollution established in the Criminal Law Amendment (8) has formally reduced the threshold of criminalization, there is much controversy in judicial practice. The dissolution of the judicial dilemma of pollution of environmental crime hinges not only on the clear standard of judicial decision, but also on the connection between the administrative organ and the judiciary in the criminal judicial process of polluting the environment and on the construction of social cognition base of environmental pollution crime under the overall view of ecological civilization “Sense of Guilt ” and “Feelings ” the existence of social scale.