论文部分内容阅读
2010年最高法院以不构成“混淆性近似”为由判决确认法国和新加坡两个大“鳄”合法共存[1],从而终结了两者在中国大陆十多年的纠葛。这是中国大陆商标司法的重大突破,否认了30年来一直处于主导地位的“近似即侵权”理念,是中国商标司法的一个里程碑。一、大陆商标共存的多样性与法律的自我矫正(一)现实中的商标共存多样性一是数量多。从商标局公布的统计数据可间接反映这种情况。截至2010年,国内商标注册申请共829.47万件,有效注册460.4万件,这表明:商标申请数量非常大,而有效注册却缩水44.5%;注册审查失误在所难免,仅2010年审查错误数约1.3万件;有效注册周期长,平均有
In 2010, the Supreme Court upheld the legal coexistence of France and Singapore with two large “crocodile” [1] judgments on the grounds that it did not constitute a “confusing approximation”, thus ending their dispute over the past decade in mainland China. This is a major breakthrough in trademark law in Mainland China. It denies the concept of “approximate infringement” that has been in the dominant position for 30 years and is a milestone in China’s trademark administration. First, the diversity of mainland trademark coexistence and legal self-correction (A) the reality of the diversity of trademark coexistence First, a large number. Statistics released from the Trademark Office can indirectly reflect this situation. As of 2010, a total of 8,294,700 domestic trademark registration applications were registered, with a total of 4,604,000 valid registrations. This shows that the number of trademark applications is very large and the effective registration has shrunk by 44.5%. Registration registration errors are inevitable, only the number of censored errors in 2010 is about 1.3 million; effective registration cycle length, on average