论文部分内容阅读
本文从新民事诉讼法第二百零三条引出“执行不作为”的概念,并参考新民事诉讼法及其相关讨论对“执行不作为”进行了界定,认为法院对有执行可能的案件即负有执行的义务,这类案件如在一定时间内未按程序执行,即构成“执行不作为”。然后,笔者又粗浅地讨论了针对不作为的救济手段,同时指出,目前更为重要的是对执行行为进行规范来防范消极执行带来的“执行难”。
In this paper, the concept of “executive omission” is derived from Article 203 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, and the definition of “misconduct” is referenced with reference to the new Civil Procedure Law and its related discussions. Of the cases that are the implementation of the obligation, such cases such as a certain period of time if the program is not implemented, that constitutes “implementation is not ”. Then, the author discussed the remedies against omission in a superficial way. At the same time, it pointed out that it is more important now to standardize the enforcement action to prevent the implementation of the “enforcement difficulty” caused by the negative enforcement.