论文部分内容阅读
针对法律中有关证据调查的方式,目前其包含的很多工作和任务并不仅仅是在口头上强调当事人的举证情况,而是限制在法官的查证之中,需要正确地划分当事人和法官查证的范畴,以便于来辩证的分析证实查证的真实和准确性。同时在这样的情况下,也能够对其中的保障机制和约束条件进行完善有关于司法证明的方式,还需要在其中全面的接受自由心证的制度,或者是法定证据制度中的任何一种非理性的选择,这也是司法证明方式的特殊性。所以在司法证明过程中还需要按照我国的具体国情以及两大法律证据规则的特点,在政治制度和角度不同的情况下,分别针对两种法律模式进行有益的分析。
In view of the way of investigating evidences in law, many tasks and tasks it currently involves do not merely emphasize the parties’ testimony, but restrict them to the verification of the judges and the classification of the parties and the judges , So that dialectical analysis can confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the verification. At the same time, under these circumstances, we can also perfect the guarantee mechanism and the restraint conditions in the judicial interpretation of the way, but also in which the full acceptance of the system of free assessment of evidence, or legal evidence in any of the system Rational choice, which is also the particularity of judicial evidence. Therefore, in the process of judicial identification, according to the specific national conditions of our country and the characteristics of the two legal rules of evidence, the two legal models should be analyzed respectively according to the different political systems and perspectives.