论文部分内容阅读
《民事诉讼法》第179条规定:“当事人的申请符合下列情形的,人民法院应再审:(一)有新的证据,足以推翻原判决裁定的”由此看出,新证据是启动民事再审程序的重要条件,也是检察机关对已生效的民事判决提起抗诉的重要原因。但是对于新证据的界定,我国法律规定却很原则,使得实践中出现了很多问题。笔者力求在总结理论界现存观点的基础上,对新证据进行解读,并提出对检察机关民事申诉案件审查程序改革的设想。
Article 179 of the Code of Civil Procedure stipulates that: “Where the party’s application meets the following conditions, the people’s court shall retrial: (a) there is new evidence that is sufficient to overthrow the original ruling”; thus, it can be seen that the new evidence is initiated The important condition of the civil retrial procedure is also the important reason why the procuratorial organs have filed a protest against the civil judgments already in force. However, for the definition of new evidence, the laws and regulations of our country are very principled, causing many problems in practice. The author seeks to interpret the new evidence on the basis of summing up the extant views of the theoretical circles and put forward the idea of reforming the procuratorial organ’s civil appeal case review procedure.