论文部分内容阅读
概述科学选材与经验选材的重要区别是:科学选材能利用多学科的理论去探讨和总结运动才能的发生发展规律,并借助多学科的测试方法对受选者进行较全面的测量和考查,从而进行科学的预测。诚然,经验选材也进行预测,但其预测的依据往往滞留在受选者当时比较表浅的运动能力上,对绝大多数所选对象——生长发育中的儿童少年,缺乏较深层的剖析和考查。这是经验选材“预测”失误、淘汰率较高的重要原因。
Overview The main difference between scientific material selection and experience material selection is that scientific material selection can make use of multidisciplinary theory to explore and summarize the occurrence and development of sportsmanship and make a comprehensive survey and examination of the candidates with multidisciplinary test methods Make scientific predictions. It is true that the selection of experience also predicts, but the predictions are often based on the comparatively superficial athletic ability of the selected candidates at that time. For the vast majority of selected children and adolescents who are undergoing growth and development, there is a lack of deeper analysis and test. This is the experience of material selection “prediction” error, a high rejection rate is an important reason.