1、审美想像的政治局限2011年第3期《文艺理论研究》刊载金浪的题为《审美想像的政治局限———略论崇高美学的两种模式及其对中国的影响》一文。文章认为,崇高看似美学问题,实则蕴含着深刻的政治内涵,并由此形成了英国经验主义与德国古典哲学两种不同叙述模式。前者通过崇高与美的互补来确保社会的合理有序,后者则寄希望于崇高来寻求超越性的主体。 1, the political limitations of aesthetic imagination in 2011 the third period “literary theory” published Jinlang entitled entitled “Political Imagination limited imagination - on the two models of sublime aesthetics and its impact on China,” a text. The article holds that sublime seemingly aesthetics problems, but in fact contains profound political connotations, and thus formed two different narrative modes of British empiricism and German classical philosophy. The former ensures social order and fairness through the complementarity of sublimeness and beauty, and the latter hopes to sublime to seek the transcendental subject.