论文部分内容阅读
本文从传统民法典中民事权利一般规定的缺失这一现象,探讨了传统民法总则的结构性缺陷,并以此为突破口,提出了在我国未来民法典中设置财产权总则来整合财产权利体系的构想。文章认为,以权利为线索构建的民法典中,民法总则并没有有效地起到区分财产权和人身权的作用,对财产权利体系也缺乏科学的立法整合。在现代无形财产日益壮大,且无形财产立法呈分散化的态势下,传统民法总则失去了原有概念法学上的价值和地位,仅在立法形式和工具意义上有其保留价值,而财产权总则这种中介性立法层次则可真正有效地整合财产关系、厘清财产关系和人身关系,并在法典的统领性和立法专门化之间寻求一种合理的平衡。
From the phenomenon of the lack of general provisions of civil rights in the traditional civil code, this paper explores the structural defects of the general rules of traditional civil law and puts forward the idea of setting the general rules of property rights in our future civil code to integrate the system of property rights. The article holds that Civil Code, which is based on the clue of rights, does not effectively play the role of distinguishing property right and personal right and also lacks scientific and legislative integration of property right system. Under the situation that the modern intangible property is getting bigger and the legislation of intangible property is decentralized, the general principle of the traditional civil law has lost the value and status of the original conceptual jurisprudence, and has its value of reservation only in the legislative form and instrumental meaning, while the general principle of property rights The kinds of intermediary legislation can truly and effectively integrate the property relations, clarify the property relations and personal relationships, and seek a reasonable balance between the guiding principles of the code and the specialization of legislation.