德拉康帕涅:喂?你能为《世界》报星期日专版写一篇关于语言的文章吗?…… 德里达:你是问我是否有能力写这篇文章呢(对于这一点确实存有疑问),还是问我是否会接受这个约稿?而后者是一个要求或邀请的问题。我对此的理解将基于语音语调、我们这电话线两端的关系,以及其他上千种可能性,总之,基于一个并非直接的语言学语境。这是一个不只限于话语,而是更为广阔并且总是敞开的文本。 在第一种(你是否有能力?)假定中,这个问题要求一个自奥斯汀(Austin)以来的,有些人称为“叙述句”(Constative)的答案。我所回答的“是”,将意味着:我的确能够做这件事。我将以这样的方式声称事情的确如此,并且对此加以定义、描述和陈述。但如果该问题有邀请 Draconanne: Hey? Can you write an article about the language for the Sunday edition of The World? ... Derrida: Are you asking me if I have the ability to write this essay? In doubt), or do you ask if I will accept this appointment? The latter is a matter of request or invitation. My understanding of this will be based on the tone of voice, the relationship between our phone lines, and thousands of other possibilities, in short, based on an indirect linguistic context. This is not a mere discourse, but a much broader and always open text. In the first hypothesis (Are You Powerful?), This question calls for an answer some since Austin has called “Constative.” The “yes” I answered will mean: I really can do it. I will in this way claim that this is indeed the case, and to be defined, described and stated. But if there's an invitation to the question