论文部分内容阅读
我国《反垄断法》中第三条所规制的垄断行为包括:经营者达成垄断协议;经营者滥用市场支配地位;具有或者可能具有排除、限制竞争效果的经营者集中。其中垄断协议又分为两种,即横向的垄断协议和纵向垄断协议,根据我国《反垄断法》第十三条第五款之规定,联合抵制交易属于具有竞争关系的经营者之间达成的横向垄断协议。目前,学理上对垄断协议和联合抵制交易行为的界定已十分明确,然而现实生活的司法实践中对联合抵制交易行为的认定尚存模糊之处,本文笔者通过分析个案,旨在为联合抵制行为提供详细的分析步骤。
The monopolistic behaviors stipulated in Article 3 of China’s Anti-monopoly Law include: the monopoly agreement reached by the operators; the abuse of market dominance by the operators; and the concentration or concentration of operators who have or may have the effect of excluding and restricting competition. The monopoly agreements are divided into two types: the horizontal monopoly agreement and the vertical monopoly agreement. According to Article 13, paragraph 5, of the Anti-monopoly Law in our country, the boycott of the transactions is between the operators having the competitive relations Horizontal monopoly agreement. At present, the academic definition of monopoly agreement and boycott transaction is very clear, however, the judicial practice of real life is still obscure to the boycott transaction. In this paper, the author analyzes the case and aims to boycott boycott behavior Provide detailed analysis steps.