论文部分内容阅读
读了冯蜂鸣先生的鉴赏文章后颇有异议。觉得冯先生并不是按盆艺最基本的标准,对作品进行恰如其分的件介.而是在作牵强附会的演义解释,实在令人不可思议。冯文说“这是一件难得的象形式盆艺作品”。象形式盆景,顾名思义,虽不能说根、干、枝冠的整体造型具象得栩栩如生,但一般也无须解释,一看便懂。触景生情.更回味无穷。如:杨吉章的《凤舞》、庄灿光的《鹿鸣》、石启业的《海狮》等等。无不把盆景艺术融于物象的特定神韵之中。恐龙不是神话,是地球上早已灭绝了的庞大物种,形象有化石作证。但未有传说或典故说它有口衔巨树的习性。
After reading the Appreciation of Mr. Feng beep quite objectionable article. Mr FUNG does not think it is incredible to interpret the works according to the most basic standards of the art of pelvic art, but rather to interpret the interpretation of his works. Feng Wen said, “This is a rare form of potted works.” Bonsai like the form, as the name implies, although can not say that the root, stem, branch crown shape with lifelike images, but generally do not have to explain, a glance understand. Touch the scene of love. More aftertaste. Such as: Yang Jizhang’s “Fung Mo”, Zhuang Canguang’s “Lu Ming”, Shi Kaiye’s “sea lions” and so on. Bonsai art all blend into the specific charm of the image. Dinosaurs are not myths, they are huge species that have long been extinct on Earth, with fossils testifying. But there is no legend or allusion that it has the habit of a gigantic tree.