论文部分内容阅读
从费希特尤其是从黑格尔开始,基于对自由的理解“承认”理论成为与权利关系紧密的东西。立足于承认理论,霍耐特和弗雷泽的“正义vs.身份”之争偏离了黑格尔意义上对自由的认知,而我们可以借助“为承认规范而斗争”的新范式,在法治国的预设下找回对权利的正确理解。“承认规范”因其与自由的关系,可以为“承认与再分配之争”提供评判标准,为“正义vs.身份”模式的转向提供构建基准,为权利领域的边际提供标示。这对于正处于法治建设攻坚阶段的当下中国,从理论依据和制度建设两个维度来说,都具有积极意义。
From Fichte, especially from Hegel, based on the understanding of freedom, the theory of “recognition” becomes something closely related to rights. Based on the recognition theory, Honnett and Fraser’s “Justice vs. Identity” dispute deviates from Hegelian perception of freedom, and we can use “to fight for the recognition of norms” The new paradigm, in the rule of law in the country under the presupposition of a correct understanding of the right. “Recognition Norms ” provides judgment criteria for “dispute of recognition and redistribution ” because of its relation with freedom, and provides a basis for the shift of “justice identity ” model, as the margin of rights field Provide labeling. This is of great significance to contemporary China, which is now at a crucial stage of the rule of law and has both dimensions of theory and system construction.