论文部分内容阅读
为了分析为何中国诗画批评标准不一,本文将诗人、诗、画三要素分开,通过比对杜甫的诗与吴道子的画的相似性、王维的诗画相通性,及诗画一体论的起源,发现之所以中国诗画批评标准不一的原因是画在当时乃从属于诗的存在,而诗具画面性,使诗画批评标准有了重叠处,令众人产生诗画原理一样的错觉,导致中国画被以中国诗的标准强求。然而因为画的局限,中国画中最贴近中国诗境界的只有王维的画,这导致中国诗画批评标准不一。
In order to analyze why Chinese poetry and painting have different standards of criticism, this paper separates the three elements of poets, poetry and painting. By comparing the similarities between Du Fu’s poems and Wu Daozi’s paintings, The reason for the different standards of criticism of Chinese poetry and painting lies in the fact that the painting was subordinate to the existence of the poem at that time, and the poetic and pictorial nature of the poetic painting made the criterion of criticism of poetry and painting overlap with each other to create the same principle of poetry and painting Illusion, resulting in Chinese painting is the standard of Chinese poetry. However, because of the limitation of painting, there is only Wang Wei’s painting in Chinese painting which is the closest to the Chinese poetic world, which leads to different standards of criticism of Chinese poetry and painting.