今年两会期间,政法机关经费划拨中 央垂直管理问题成为代表、委员们讨论非 常热烈的话题。实际上,全国上下有此呼 声的部门又何止政法机关?自90年代以 来,先后有税务、工商、质监等多个部门实 行了全国或省以下垂直管理,其初衷无非 是通过保持人事、财务的独立来摆脱地方 保护主义的困扰。但是,垂直管理真就是 一剂灵丹妙药吗?我看也未必。 长期以来,我国大部分执法部门是 实行地方政府和上级部门双重领导的, 人、财、物属于地方,业务指导则属上级。 通过将人、财、物划归上级部门,来摆脱 地方政府的强力干预,对治理地方保护 主义有一定效果,但由此带来的负作用 During this year’s NPC and CPPCC sessions, representatives of the political and legal departments allocated funds for the issue of vertical management of the Central Committee and the members discussed very warm topics. In fact, since the 1990s, there have been many departments such as taxation, industry and commerce, quality supervision and other departments that have implemented vertical management at or below the provincial level. The original intention was nothing more than the maintenance of personnel and finance Independence to get rid of local protectionism. However, vertical management is really a panacea? I think not necessarily. For a long time, most of the law enforcement agencies in our country are under the dual leadership of the local government and the superior departments. People, financial affairs and property belong to the localities, while the operational guidance belongs to the superior. By putting people, money and goods under the higher authorities to get rid of the powerful intervention of local governments, it has some effect on the governance of local protectionism, but the negative effect it brings