现代法院作为“社会纠纷裁判中心”,是专司纠纷裁判功能的组织机构。在功能设定上,我国法院存在着一种二律背反的现象:一方面法院承担着大量的非裁判性功能;另一方面,许多应该由法院承担的纠纷裁判功能事实上并没有归入法院。因此,应该借鉴现代西方国家法院功能的定位,理性地界定和建构我国法院的纠纷裁判功能。其一,应进行法院功能的“净化”,把非裁判性功能从法院的功能范围中剥离出去;其二,应进行法院功能的扩充,把非纠纷裁判主体拥有的纠纷裁判权统一划归法院行使。 As a “center of judicial review of social disputes,” the modern court is an organization that specializes in the functions of judicial adjudication. In function setting, there is a paradoxical phenomenon in our country's courts: on the one hand, the court bears a great deal of non-refereeing function; on the other hand, many of the judicial adjudication functions which should be borne by the court are not in fact put into court. Therefore, we should draw lessons from the function of the court in the modern western countries to rationally define and construct the function of the court adjudication in our country. First, the “purification” of the functions of the courts should be carried out to separate non-referential functions from the functional scope of the courts. Second, the expansion of the functions of the courts should be carried out and the unification of disputes jurisdiction owned by the non-disputes adjudicators should be assigned to courts exercise.