论文部分内容阅读
本文分析了当前我国几个具有较大影响力的网购网站,对阐明现有的网上交易服务提供者所处地位的五种学术观点分别做出了论述。其中,除了反对“被委托人或代理人”学说之外,笔者认为“卖方或合营方”、“柜台出租方”、“居间方”、“网络平台提供商”观点均在现今的网络交易中有所体现,并且还进一步结合了网上交易服务提供者的审查义务对另外的四种观点进行了论述,提出要进一步完善立法以加强我国对于网络交易中消费者的保护。
This paper analyzes several current online shopping websites in China that have great influence, and discusses five academic viewpoints that illustrate the status of existing online transaction service providers. Among them, in addition to objecting to the “trustee or agent” doctrine, I believe that “seller or joint venture”, “counter leasing party”, “intermediary party”, “network platform provider ”The views are reflected in today’s online transactions, and further combine the obligations of online trading service providers to review the other four points of view, and propose that we must further improve the legislation to strengthen our consumption of online transactions. Protectors.