论文部分内容阅读
目的：探析急诊科收治急性心肌梗死患者采取溶栓治疗方案干预临床效果。方法纳入于2013年———2015年期间本院急诊科收治确诊急性心肌梗死患者100例为本次研究对象，其中50例采取常规心肌梗死治疗方案患者设为对照组，另50例采取急诊溶栓治疗方案干预患者设为观察组。对照急性心肌梗死患者接受两种方案治疗临床效果。结果经急性心肌梗死临床疗效评价，观察组有6例判定无效，对照组有14例判定无效，总有效率数据对比有统计学意义（P＜0．05）；观察组患者出现心律失常、心力衰竭、死亡等事件例数明显少于对照组，数据对比有差异性（P＜0．05）。结论急诊科收治急性心肌梗死患者用溶栓方案对患者病情进行干预，疗效显著，该方案对保障患者预后质量有重要作用，值得推广。“,”Objective To study the therapeutic ef ect of thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction in emergency department.Methods included in the period 2013 to 2015 in emergency department of our hospital were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)100 cases as the research object,including 50 cases take regular myocardial infarction treatment schemes were set as control group,another 50 cases take emergency thrombolytic therapy intervention patients as the observation group.Patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with two kinds of therapeutic schemes.Results the clinical ef icacy evaluation of acute myocardial infarction(AMI),in the observation group,6 cases were judged invalid,the control group14caseswerejudgedinvalid,eficiencycomparisonofthedatawasstatisticalysignificant(P<0.05);observationgrouppatientsthenumberofincidentcasesofarrhythmia,heartfailure and death significantly less than that ofthe control group,comparative data have diferences(P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction in patients with the disease intervention,the ef ect is significant,the program has an important role in ensuring the quality of the prognosis of pa-tients,it is worth promoting.