论文部分内容阅读
清末民初以来,唐人楷法的影响日显微弱,这和碑学观念的蔚然成风有关。通过比较,包世臣、康有为认为唐代楷书已经古法丧失殆尽,不仅笔法无存,结构也无生气。包世臣说:“北碑字有定法,而出之自在,故多变态;唐人书无定势,而出之矜持,故形板刻。”康有为说:“书有南、北朝,隶、楷、行、草,体变各极,奇伟婉丽,意态斯备,至矣!观斯止矣。至于有唐,虽设书学,士大夫讲之尤甚。然缵承陈、隋之余,缀其遗绪之一二,不复能变,专讲结构,几若算子。截鹤续凫,整齐过甚。欧、虞、褚、薛,笔法虽未尽亡,然浇淳散朴,
Since the late Qing Dynasty and early the Republic of China, the influence of the Kai style of the Tang dynasty has become increasingly weak, which has something to do with the tradition of the tablet. By comparison, Bao Shichen, Kang Youwei that the regular script in the Tang Dynasty has been depleted of the ancient law, not only writing no deposit, the structure is also lifeless. Bao Shichen said: ”The Northern inscriptions have a certain law, but out of the way, so much perverted; the Tang no fixed book, and out of the hold, shaped engraving.“ Kang Youwei said: ”The book has South, North As for the Tang, although set book study, the scholar-doctor talked about even more.However, Chen Cheng, Sui Yu, one of its legacy two, no longer able to change, specifically about the structure, if a few operators. Cuttings crane continued 凫, tidy too .Eu, Yu, Chu, Xue, although the law did not die, and then poured Chun San Park,