论文部分内容阅读
前此曾以《<广雅疏证>辨补》为题,对王念孙《广雅疏证》当疏未疏与仅注“未详”条目,分别予以补疏、试解;“疏证”之中,笔者以为未为允洽者,则提出质疑辨正;例当分类而脱漏条目,补以分类;词义、例证以为有补入必要者,亦酌情增益。尔来复检《广雅疏证》,上述各类条目,辑录数量又有所增加;兹一仍前用“未详”试解、“疏证”质疑、仿例补疏、分类补阙、补义增例等标目,分条继述,题曰“续篇”。才疏识陋,定有纰漏谬误,深望方家不吝教正。
Former title of “ Discrimination” as a title, on Wang Nian-sun “Guang Ya Shuxiang” when the sparse non-sparse and only Note “unknown ” entries, respectively, Card “, I think that those who did not agree, then put forward the challenge of discrimination; cases when the classification and omitting entries, make up the classification; meaning, exemplification that there is a necessity, but also gain as appropriate. To re-examine the ”Guang Ya Soothsaying,“ the above categories of entries, the number of editors has increased; this is a still before the ”unspecified “ test, ”Doubt “ questioning, Complement Que, additional meaning of additional items such as heading, sub-article following the statement, title said ”sequel ". Only to understand the poor, there is flawed fallacy, Fang Fang Fang not hesitate to teach.