论文部分内容阅读
一个时期以来,我国哲学界有不少人以存在论或生存论为坐标来理解和诠释马克思主义哲学,并由此说明马克思哲学在本质上属于现代哲学。日本马克思主义理论家广松涉认为,海德格尔的存在论隐含着先验永恒的人性论,海德格尔的“整体性的因缘关联”实际上就是人因“所用”、“所向”、“所为”并通过“用具”所构建的“实践关联关系的场”,在此基础上,广松涉批判地改造了海德格尔的存在论思想并代之以实践关联关系的“场”的概念。这种批判性的改造使他的思想比较接近于马克思的唯物史观。然而,马克思的唯物史观不仅与海德格尔等人的存在论,而且还与广松涉的社会历史生成论存在明显的不同,不能把他们不加区分地混淆为同一种哲学世界观理论。
Since a certain period of time, many people in the philosophical circles of our country have interpreted and interpreted Marxist philosophy with the existentialism or existentialism as the coordinate system. This shows that Marxist philosophy essentially belongs to modern philosophy. Hiroshi Komatsu, a Japanese Marxist theorist, thinks that Heidegger’s theory of existence implies a transcendental humanity theory. Heidegger’s “holistic cause-and-effect relationship” is actually a result of “using”, “ Based on this, Guang Song involved critically reconstructed Heidegger’s existentialism and replaced it with the practice of the ”field" of the relation, the concept of. This critical transformation made his thought relatively close to Marx’s historical materialism. However, Marx’s historical materialism not only exists with Heidegger’s existentialism, but also with Guangshen’s social-historical genesis theory. There are obvious differences. They can not be confused indiscriminately with the same philosophical worldview theory.