过去因古籍工作的关系,曾略闻桑弘羊之名,看到《盐铁论》,也翻了几页。到了“文革”时,炒《盐铁论》的文章,真象春潮带雨晚来急,桑弘羊已成为秦始皇系统人物,当时正忙于荷锄耘土,就把它看作一池春水了。最近化了大半天时间,将《盐铁论》浏览了一遍,文字不算怎样艰深,大体可懂。对话体的作品,先秦时已有滥觞,例如《战国策》。当时还没有速记术,也不知怎样会记录得如此详细。《盐铁论》还记录许多先秦故事,有名有姓,双方各找历史根据,更佩服桓次山的强记敏悟的本领。 In the past due to the relationship between the ancient books, Sang Hongyang had a slight smell of the name, see “Salt and Iron”, but also turned a few pages. At the time of the “Cultural Revolution”, the article on “salt and iron theory” really came as a result of the late spring tide and the rain. Sang Hongyang became the system figure of the Qin Shi Huang. At that time, he was busy with Hoe-Yun soil and regarded it as a pool Spring water. Recently most of the time, the “Salt and Iron” Browse again, the text is not how hard, generally understandable. The works of the dialogue body, have existed in the pre-Qin period, such as “Warring States policy.” There were no shorthand techniques at that time and I did not know how to record such detail. “Salt and Iron” also records many stories before the Qin Dynasty, a well-known surname, both sides look for historical evidence, but also admire Huanchushan’s ability to remember the mind.