论文部分内容阅读
利用无害的控制下交付抓获的犯罪分子的行为属于刑法上典型的对象不能犯,但对其可罚性的认定,存在纯粹客观说、纯粹主观说、抽象危险说、绝对不能·相对不能说、客观危险说、具体危险说、印象说、定型说、事实不能·法律不能说等不同的学说。之所以不同学说对不能犯可罚性问题会有不同理解,是因为其在主观主义刑法观和客观主义刑法观之间,行为无价值论和结果无价值论之间有着不同的选择。就无害的控制下交付而言,应肯定抓获犯罪分子的可罚性。
Delivering captured criminals under innocent control is typical of the criminal law and can not be committed, but the determination of its punitive character is purely objective. It is purely subjective and absurd to say that it can not, Objectively dangerous, said the specific danger that the impression that stereotypes, the fact can not be law can not say different doctrines. The reason why different doctrines differ in their understanding of the problem of punishability is that they have different choices between the subjectivist criminal law concept and the objectivist criminal law concept, the behavioral non-value theory and the result non-value theory. As far as harmless control and delivery are concerned, the criminal penalties of criminals should be apprehended.