以前有人说:“买IBM的东西永远也不会被炒掉”。数年来,供应商的名字偶有变化,变成谁取决于当时的具体情况,但这种说法的意蕴一直没有改变,那就是:紧跟最大的供应商,明哲保身,即便出了问题,老板也不能把你怎么样。但是对于一个应该具有前瞻性的部门来说,很显然,这样的策略就未免过于保守了——这个策略的着眼点是规避风险(同时保全当事人的面子),而不是勇于眼睛向外,即便其他供应商可能为企业带来巨大的好处。不过这个套路 Someone once said: “Buy IBM stuff will never be fired ”. Over the years, the name of the supplier has changed by accident from time to time, depending on the circumstances at the time. However, the implication of this statement has not changed. That is, keeping up with the largest suppliers, even if something goes wrong, the boss Can not take you how? But for a supposedly proactive department, it is clear that such a strategy is too conservative - the strategy is to avoid risks (while preserving the party’s face), rather than be bold outside, even if the other Suppliers can bring huge benefits to the business. However, this routine