论文部分内容阅读
19世纪末20世纪初,因地缘关系而不是基于历史权利,法国政府、驻广东领事与印度支那总督府讨论西沙建灯塔、中国地方政府西沙主权宣示之事,内有觊觎西沙之念,但因内部意见分歧以及条件不成熟而作罢,此时亦有对中国西沙主权的“肯定”、对两群岛不归属于安南之论。两广总督派员勘查西沙、宣示主权,其目的和动机是针对某些列强的觊觎行为,并成为后来中国政府论证主权的重要历史证据。然而因对法国的动向不明了,中国政府并没有将其当作主要防范目标,致使相应的举措缺少针对性。中国政局的混乱和海疆意识的薄弱,使南海疆域危机处于逐渐加深的趋势。
In the late 19th century and the early 20th century, the French government, the consul in Guangdong and the governor-general of Indochina discussed the Xisha construction beacon and the announcement of the sovereignty of the Xisha in China’s local government due to the geographical relationship rather than the historical rights. However, due to the internal Disagreements and conditions are immature and gave up. At this time, there are also “affirmations” of the sovereignty of Xisha in China and arguments that the two islands do not belong to Annam. The Governor-General of Guangdong and Guangxi dispatched officers to investigate Xisha and proclaim the sovereignty. Its purpose and motive are aimed at the shameful actions of certain powers and have subsequently become an important historical evidence of the Chinese government’s justification of sovereignty. However, due to the uncertainty about the French move, the Chinese government did not regard it as the main preventive target, resulting in the lack of pertinence of corresponding measures. The political turmoil in China and the weak sense of the sea territory make the SCS crisis in a gradual deepening trend.