论文部分内容阅读
知情同意作为侵犯患者身体权、隐私权最有力的抗辩事由,在某种紧急情况下可能无法实现,这时候我们需要寻找其他抗辩事由来证明医疗行为的合理性,本文通过论述我国《侵权责任法》第56条关于紧急情况下实施医疗行为的抗辩事由的规定,认为紧急情况下能否实施医疗行为与医疗机构负责人是否批准没有必然的逻辑关系,医疗机构负责人的批准并不能作为一个合理的抗辩事由存在,并参照各国立法,提出新的抗辩事由。
Informed consent, as the most powerful defenses to violate the right of the patient’s body and privacy, may not be realized in certain emergency situations. At this time, we need to find other defenses to prove the rationality of medical behaviors. This article discusses the tort law of our country, Article 56 of the Provisions on Defenses in Implementing Medical Practices in Emergency Situations is that it is not necessary to have any logical relationship between the possibility of medical actions in emergencies and whether the person in charge of medical institutions approves the approval of the responsible person of a medical institution and should not be taken as a reasonable Defenses exist, and reference to national legislation, put forward new defenses.