论文部分内容阅读
如今,维权报道占了媒体的相当部分,每年“3·1 5”前后,维权报道更是媒体主打。3月中旬,某报刊发了一张图片,配发的文字大致是这样的:2003年1 0月1 9日,泰州市民孙先生花4200元钱购买天津某公司生产的保健床垫、被子等,听介绍说能治疗高血压和糖尿病,然而几个月使用后无任何效果。索赔无望的他一怒之下把自己的亲身经历制成戗牌,提醒市民不要和他一样再受骗上当。值得注意的是,图片中清晰可见产品名称。 这则报道意在赞扬消费者的自我维权,但事件本身却有侵权之嫌。因为孙先生所使用的保健产品质量问题并没有经过诸如质监局等权威部门的鉴定,仅是孙先生及其他几位使用过的消费者的个人感受而已,也就是说,是个例还是共性问题,尚无定论。
Nowadays, reports of rights protections account for a considerable part of the media. Before and after the “March 15” each year, reports of rights protections were even more prominent in the media. In mid-March, a newspaper published a picture, with the text is roughly like this: January 10, 2003 January 10, Mr. Sun, Taizhou City, spent 4200 yuan to buy a company in Tianjin health mattresses, quilts, etc. , Said that can treat high blood pressure and diabetes, but after a few months without any effect. Unable to hope his claim to his own personal experience into a slaughter card, to remind the public not to be fooled like him. It is noteworthy that, the picture clearly visible product name. This report is intended to commend consumers for their own rights, but the incident itself is suspected of infringement. Because the quality of health products used by Mr. Sun did not pass such as the Bureau of Quality Supervision and other authorities identified only Mr. Sun and several other consumers have personal feelings that is, is a case or a common problem ,Inconclusive.