论文部分内容阅读
2012年刑事诉讼法确立了非法证据排除规则,却没有对重复供述问题进行规定。通过对重复供述概念的重新界定,将它与非法证据和毒树之果区别开来,明确了重复供述的外延与内涵。在排除重复供述必要性问题上,一方面借用非法证据排除规则的必要性为理论基础,另一方面论证了排除重复供述是保障证据链条准确性的重要环节,同时,主张对重复供述的排除应该有所限制。
The Criminal Procedure Law of 2012 established the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, but did not stipulate the issue of double confession. By redefining the concept of repetitive confession, it is distinguished from the evidence of illegal act and the result of poison tree, and the extension and connotation of repeated confession are clarified. On the one hand, the necessity of using rule of exclusion of illegitimate evidence as theoretic foundation; on the other hand, it is argued that eliminating double statement of confession is an important link to guarantee the accuracy of evidence chain. At the same time, it is argued that the exclusion of duplicate confession should be Limited.