论文部分内容阅读
对于二审中上诉人撤回上诉,执行的依据到底是一审的判决还是上诉人与被上诉人达成的和解协议的问题,现行法律并没有做出明确规定。2011年12月20日最高人民法院发布的第一批四个指导性案例中的2号案例“吴梅诉四川省眉山西城纸业有限公司买卖合同纠纷案”中,最高院给出了其指导意见。但是对于最高院裁判争论却没有停止。文章着眼于二审中和解协议的性质,以期解决二审和解协议与一审生效判决的效力冲突问题。
There is no explicit stipulation in the current law about whether the appellant should withdraw the appeal in the second instance, whether the basis of the enforcement is the judgment of the first instance or the settlement agreement reached between the appellant and the appellee. On December 20, 2011, the Supreme People’s Court issued the first four guiding cases of No. 2 case “Wu Mei v. Meishan, Meishan, Xicheng Paper Co., Ltd. Sale and Dispute Case”, the Supreme Court gave Its guidance. But the Supreme Court controversy has not stopped. The article looks at the nature of the settlement agreement in the second instance with a view to resolving the conflict of the validity of the settlement agreement between the second instance and the first instance.